The landscape of higher education is definitely changing (eg along with these shifts we have seen the rise and influence of accreditation bodies in implementing graduate mental health programs. In fact, there are many professions that postgraduate students train to practice psychotherapy, such as psychologists, professional counselors , social workers, marital and family therapists, addiction counselors, school counselors and psychiatrists, to name a few. Due to the emerging scope of Psychotherapy , mostly student love to join Psychotherapy Training Institute
Together with these professions, there are their accreditation boards / commissions, which oversee the standards of individual professions. In addition, there are licensing boards that ensure that professionals meet the necessary and sufficient requirements to obtain a license. I believe that accreditation can be a positive force in training mental health providers. However, there is also a shadow in this process which, if left untreated and unquestioned, can create a division between professionals who have a common goal on many levels.
As for the Society for the Development of Psychotherapy (SAP), I believe it is wise to open my hearts and minds to building bridges, taking new initiatives and honoring the unique perspectives of the professions.
However, there are no clear and consistent differences in psychotherapy outcomes, and there are small differences in basic definitions between professionals. For example, defining the basics of what a professional counselor does from a counseling psychologist is very similar. Both focus on professional work, multiculturalism, social justice, mentoring, supervision and development.
I would say that these identities are shared by other professions. It is clear that there are similarities and differences within and between our professions. However, if these similarities and differences are respected and respected, this process can be a source of wealth, growth and prosperity.
Why training resolutions?
Before describing the resolutions of the training, it is useful to give some background as to why I decided to take part in this effort. Firstly, I believe that professionals should be judged on their professional skills, not on their own. For example, Drs. V. Beck graduated from a psychiatrist. It’s hard to imagine that no training program would hire him to train the next generation of mental health professionals.
However, due to the mandates of certain accreditation rules / principles, this will not happen. Some of the most famous scholars and theorists in all of our disciplines are not considered major positions in the faculty in some programs because of their final degree – what they did otherwise, or if the programs themselves use information from theorists to train their students.
However, competence is not a static state. As psychotherapists, we must continue to demonstrate effectiveness, and if this does not happen for any professional, it needs to be addressed. Let’s stop mixing levels of education, experience, competencies and efficiency.
If the research results do not provide a clear and consistent relationship between these factors, we must go back and consider the true skill of psychotherapy (Anderson et al., 2015; Goldberg et al., 2015; al., 2016). Consider the following example, which illustrates the difficulty of answering this question: Do Socratic questions have a different effect when a psychologist puts them against a social worker?
It may seem like a crazy task, but it could be a logical examination of psychotherapy if we want to show the differences in our professions. What do we get this way? Simply put, when it comes to performing the same task (eg psychotherapy), why should different professions be favored or disadvantaged on the basis of a degree? Especially if there is no consistent or meaningful evidence to show the advantage of one profession over another in this area. Shouldn’t we use empirical evidence in our decisions? Or is it only if the evidence corresponds to our ideological desires? There must be a new way to understand the therapist’s expertise, especially across disciplines.